The changes in the layout of the Woodward university.
The maps elucidate the alterations in the layout of the Woodward university between 1985 to present. At first glance, it is evident that the most noticeable changes occurred for the size of spacious area in the centre of learning from 1985 to present.
To begin with the north part of the educational institution, there was new library and IT centre which were established in the northwest of the university. To the west of the library, 1985 to present witnessed the alterations of physics block and chemistry block which had been replaced by the science laboratories, and to the south of the science laboratories, the position of car park had been altered into a lecture theatre.
In accordance with the south of the centre of learning, the shuttle bus terminal was built in the southwest of the educational institution which altered the place of car park in previous time. Moreover, the biggest changes occurred for the size of the main road in 1985 in which it had been replaced by the footpaths, the smaller admin building and the larger size of spacious area.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of female members of parliament in 5 European countries from 2000 to 2012. 84
- Line graph : Clothing Export in 1999 - 2003 in Japan, Colombia and Myanmar. 73
- Essay topics: Line graph : Clothing Export in 1999 - 2003 in Japan, Colombia and Myanmar. 78
- Line graph : Clothing Export in 1999 - 2003 in Japan, Colombia and Myanmar. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 91, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'centres'?
Suggestion: centres
...stitution, there was new library and IT centre which were established in the northwest...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, moreover, so, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 889.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88461538462 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76792769795 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494505494505 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.1900905877 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.166666667 112.824112599 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.3333333333 22.9334400587 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124985767767 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0667668605883 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688455298238 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0852286719436 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.066470050344 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.62 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.