The given chart illustrates how Japan's population changes from 1950 to 2015 with a prediction for forty following years. Meanwhile, the table below shows the elder population's milestones and how they contribute to the total statistic.
Overall, the number of inhabitants in Japan steadily increases from the past to the present while the figure is forecast to decline in the future. In the same survey, the Japanese population tend to age increasingly over the whole period.
According to the given chart, the Japanese total population starts at 84,1 million in 1950 and keep rising to its peak of 127.8 million in 2005. After that, the figure decreases slightly to 125,4 in 2015. In the 40 following years, the total population is predicted to dramatically decline to 89,9 million people in 2055, only more than 5 million compared to the starting point.
Turning to the table which presents how the elder population changes over the period. Starting at 4,1 million people in 1950, the figure surges to 25,7 million in 2005 which contributes 4,9% and 20% respectively to the total population. In 2035 and 2055, the number of elder in Japan is projected to leap to 37,2 and 36,5 which accounts for 34% and 41% of the Japanese population.
- The graph below shows the US consumers average annual expenditures on cell phone and residential phone services
- Information technology is changing many aspects of our lives and now dominates our home leisure and work activities To what extent do the benefits of information technology outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012 78
- The climograph below shows average monthly temperatures and rainfall in the city of Kolkata Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person Give reasons f 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1032.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96153846154 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66661851226 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524038461538 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5684375567 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.2 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 5.23603664747 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123118087362 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546131514045 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0268832374985 0.0843802449381 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0816671845335 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029968067606 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.