The two given graphs illustrate the amount of indigenous and foreign undergraduates enrol in Australian universities from 2001 to 2010.
Overall, in commencing, the enrolments rate of overseas students is higher compared to local ones while in total, the number of domestic students enrols in Australian universities dramatically surpasses the foreign students’ rate. However, local students' rates in Australian universities always exceed international students'.
Firstly, it is obvious that overseas students continued to enrol in universities in Australia throughout the whole period. For commencing, the figure started at above 10 thousands and then kept surging until reached its highest number at over 40 thousand. In total, in 2001, there were about 20 thousand students enrolled in Australian universities and the figure continued to rise to over 30 thousand in the final year of the ten-years period.
Secondly, when it comes to local enrolments, its figure fluctuated over the period. In commencing, starting at about 18 thousand, the number rose to 22 thousand in 2002 and decreased to 19000 in 2006, then slightly increased to 22 thousand again and finally dropped to 20 thousand in 2010. Meanwhile, in total, starting at 40000, the figure jumped to over 60000 enrolments in 2007, then maintained stability in the three final years.
- Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Write about the following topic Computers are often argued to be the most important invention of the last hundred years To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your o 84
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagrams below show the design for a wave energy machine and its location Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1143.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49519230769 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01567266457 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533653846154 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 331.2 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3422005257 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.396624246834 0.215688989381 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.183161668443 0.103423049105 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130425527674 0.0843802449381 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237201725662 0.15604864568 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125017889659 0.0819641961636 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.