The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the total population, while the table demonstrates the figures for the elderly population in Japan from 1950 to 2055.
Overall, Japan's population rose significantly, however, if the prediction is correct, the figure for the population in Japan will decline. Meanwhile, the number of old people increased significantly and is expected to continue to grow.
Looking at the bar chart, the population in Japan soared from 84.1 million to over 100 million in 1970. Afterward, it kept growing and reached its peak at 127.8 million in 2010 before reducing by approximately 2 million in 2015. In the next 40 years, Japan's population is predicted to plummet to about 90 million, almost equalling the number in 1955.
Turning to the table, although the proportion of people who are 65 years old or older was only 4.1 million, it climbed by over 20 million in 55 years. The elderly population is forecasted to be 37.2 million in 2035 but will drop to 36.5 million by 2055. By contrast, the rate of people who falls into the 65 or over age group has shown an upward trend without a sign of decrease.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-03 | tranvuongphuongmy | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-09 | soomi2209 | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-20 | Sayansh Garg | 67 | view |
| 2021-08-20 | Sayansh Garg | 67 | view |
| 2021-07-15 | _sea.canary_ | 92 | view |
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people believe that a country will benefit greatly if its students study abroad To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The pie charts below give data on the spending and consumption of resources by countries of the world and how the population is distributed Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009 the second compares the percentage of trains running on time and target in the period 78
- Topic The table below shows the salaries of secondary high school teachers in 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 57, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...able, although the proportion of people who are 65 years old or older was only 4.1 mill...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 931.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84895833333 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75968445478 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604166666667 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 18.0438423545 43.030603864 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.444444444 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125443439937 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592502284186 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638353885898 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0952738169759 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0537378112984 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.