The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The presented chart illustrates the past, present, and future trends of Japan's population in millions. A table has also been provided which depicts the population of people aged 65 years or above in percentages and millions as well.
Overall, the population of Japan had shown a gradual increase in the past and is expected to get reduced in the future. Whereas, the population of people 65 years and above had shown a consistent rise in the past and same is expected for the future.
Talking about details, population growth in the past had shown a gradual increase in numbers from the year 1950 till 1995, rising from 84.1 up to 125.5 million respectively. From the year 1995, the population remained steady to some extent, till the year 2010, accounting for 127.1 million people. Now it is predicted that the population in Japan will decrease in the future. In 2015 population will be reduced to 125.4 million, as continuing this predicted trend, population will be reduced to 110 and 89.9 in the year 2035 and 2055 respectively.
The population of people (65 years or above) was rising in the past. In 1950, about 4.1 million people are either 65 years or above, thus making 4.9% of all. Whereas, in 2005, this category of the population has grown to 25.7 million, around 20% of the whole population of Japan. This population rise is expected to escalate in the future as well. Increasing to about 37.2 and 36.5 in the year 2035 and 2055 respectively, and an even higher proportion of population 34.0% and 41.0% of all.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-03 | tranvuongphuongmy | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-09 | soomi2209 | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-20 | Sayansh Garg | 67 | view |
| 2021-08-20 | Sayansh Garg | 67 | view |
| 2021-07-15 | _sea.canary_ | 92 | view |
- The diagram shows the design of a modern landfill for household waste Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram below shows how coffee is produced and prepared for sale in supermarkets and shops Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The table below shows the sales made by a coffee shop in an office building on a typical weekday Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Information technology is changing many aspects of our lives and now dominates our home leisure and work activities To what extent do the benefits of information technology outweigh the disadvantages 80
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, thus, well, whereas, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 3.97073170732 378% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1267.0 965.302439024 131% => OK
No of words: 264.0 196.424390244 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79924242424 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6234636284 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.458333333333 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 364.5 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6517142182 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4615384615 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3076923077 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.38461538462 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125525789215 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602078218681 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0245050553584 0.0843802449381 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0904866944382 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0262065789185 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.08 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.