The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Leisure time in a typical week in hour by sex and employment status 19

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status.

Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.

Leisure time in a typical week in hour- by sex and employment status, 1998-99.

The vertically stacked bar graph presents the number of hours spent per week at ease by men and women of different employment statuses from the year 1998 to 1999.

Briefly, this graph highlights that people who were unemployed or had retired from their work were likely to spend much more weekly hours for their leisure. Whereas, employed people did not spend that much at ease.

Men who were working full time spent almost 45 hours in a typical week, as against the women who were spending 7 hours lesser. Following the similar variation among both the genders, men who were retired or did not have any work spent almost equal hours, about 84 per week, whereas, women spent 7 hours lesser. But, these two categories liked to spend the most on leisure in comparison to all others.

The graph does not provide the data for men who were doing part time jobs, but women working at part time jobs spent around 40 hours per week for their leisure. Women working at their respective homes, doing the household chores were spending 50 hours of their schedule per week for their relief.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-07-16 cupinsiuway 89 view
2023-07-16 cupinsiuway 81 view
2023-05-30 hieu13092006 67 view
2023-05-27 Siva_K 73 view
2022-01-10 mrinal 73 view
Essays by user Sayansh Garg :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 158, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ch more weekly hours for their leisure. Whereas, employed people did not spend that muc...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 22, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...t much at ease. Men who were working full time spent almost 45 hours in a typical week...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 60, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...provide the data for men who were doing part time jobs, but women working at part time jo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 97, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...ng part time jobs, but women working at part time jobs spent around 40 hours per week for...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, but, if, so, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 898.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72631578947 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.0956623187 2.65546596893 79% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552631578947 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.309668022 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.25 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196804626068 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0987338259389 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539617302669 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132195850702 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.042989575463 0.0819641961636 52% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.