The chart andgraph below give information about participants who have entered the Olympics since it began

Essay topics:

The chart andgraph below give information about participants who have entered
the Olympics since it began

The given graph and chart provide information regarding the number of Olympic participants according to their gender over a period of nearly a century, from 1924 to 2012. As can be observed, the general trend was of an increase with women having a more significant rise. Despite this, there had always been more males than females taking part in the games.
Taking a close look at the charts, there was a gradual increase from 3000 to 5000 Olympic partakers in which males accounted for a vast majority with 4500 by 1952. This means that females hardly entered the games. Over 3 decades later, even though the number of female athletes witnessed a more considerable upsurge to 1500 out of 7000 in total, it, however, was only one-third as high as the figure for males, with 5200.
By 2012, while male partakers had kept a steady upward trend and peaked at nearly 6000, females recorded a more dramatic climb. Particularly, it had soared by three-fold to hit the highest point of roughly 4800, making the total number of attendants surge to over 10 000 by the end of the period.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-05 Minhchi2007 view
2023-01-30 vermaparmish 67 view
2023-01-01 trangthanthien25 view
2022-10-22 Huyenlbg87 11 view
2022-10-05 WindOlivia 61 view
Essays by user Huyenlbg87 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 285, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g a more significant rise. Despite this, there had always been more males than fe...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, regarding, so, third, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 893.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72486772487 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44321873115 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650793650794 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.274581429 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.625 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.625 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.07497665524 0.215688989381 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.034828792787 0.103423049105 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478717059378 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0512286299161 0.15604864568 33% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487964051642 0.0819641961636 60% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.