The given bar graph demonstrates information about the proportion of people consuming five servings of fruit and vegetables in the UK in each day between 2001 and 2008.
Overall, it can be seen that the highest of percentages of all people who had 5 portions of fruit and vegetables was women, whereas children accounted for the lowest of percentages over the period given.
As be shown from illustration, the percentage of women who ate fruit and vegetables started at just 20% in 2001. This figure
rose steadily to reach the peak of almost 35% in 2006, before falling slightly to 30% in the final year.
In the terms of men and children eating fruit and vegetables, the rate remained stable over first three years (approximately 17%, 12% respectively. From this point, the rate of men climbed gradually to reach the peak of around 28% in 2007 ,after which it dropped to just 26% in 2008. A similar growth in the figure for children was evident reaching 25% and around 24%in the last year.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 59, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... seen that the highest of percentages of all people who had 5 portions of fruit a...
^^
Line 5, column 125, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...started at just 20% in 2001. This figure rose steadily to reach the peak of almos...
^^^
Line 8, column 71, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...en eating fruit and vegetables, the rate remained stable over first three years a...
^^
Line 8, column 190, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...From this point, the rate of men climbed gradually to reach the peak of around 28...
^^
Line 8, column 241, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... to reach the peak of around 28% in 2007 ,after which it dropped to just 26% in ...
^^
Line 8, column 265, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ound 28% in 2007 ,after which it dropped to just 26% in 2008. A similar growth i...
^^
Line 8, column 274, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in 2007 ,after which it dropped to just 26% in 2008. A similar growth in the fig...
^^
Line 8, column 357, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re for children was evident reaching 25% and around 24%in the last year.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 828.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78612716763 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62267272878 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612716763006 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1939261717 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.285714286 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298522247224 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124018445638 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120934133735 0.0843802449381 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160950132081 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11531670034 0.0819641961636 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.