The chart below
The six charts provide an overall view of how the usage of water varied among six regions on Earth (namely, North America, South America, Europe, Africa, Central Asia and South East Asia) with regards to three industries comprising industrial, agricultural and domestic sectors.
As can be seen from the charts, there are four areas (South America, Africa, Central Asia and South East Asia) where the usage of water in agriculture accounted for the biggest share of their total water consumption.
First, it is evident from the information provided that Europe and North America were the two areas with the largest percentage of water use for industrial purpose-53% versus 48%. Africa and Central Asia were on the list as well, however, amounted for the smallest share, 7% and 5% respectively. On the other hand, Europe and North America reached the low end of the ranking in agricultural use, taking up 39% and 32% seperately, while Central Asia ranked first at 88%. Last but not least, we can observe that domestic sector in both Central Asia and South East Asia received a mere 7% of water-the lowest overall. Otherwise, South America was domestically supported by the most significant water figure of 19%. Also, Europe and North America followed behind, each used 13 to 15% of their total water.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 278, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ial, agricultural and domestic sectors. As can be seen from the charts, there ar...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 590, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'water-the the lowest'.
Suggestion: water-the the lowest
...d South East Asia received a mere 7% of water-the lowest overall. Otherwise, South America was d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, well, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1088.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03703703704 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52943915014 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 342.0 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.4931718771 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.0 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0198342604524 0.215688989381 9% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00790853152923 0.103423049105 8% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0209240076621 0.0843802449381 25% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0210894174113 0.15604864568 14% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0298249401256 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 61.2550243902 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.