The chart below give information about the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050
(1) The pie charts present the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.
(2) In Yemen, being the most popular age group, people aged below 15 took up half of the pie chart in 2000, followed by 46.3 per cent of those who are between 15 and 59. (3)They are forecasted to change in popularity in 2050 as the working age interval may account for the biggest segment of almost 60 per cent. (4)The 0-14 age bracket shall witness a substantial shrinkage to less than 40 per cent, opposed to the over-60 community which is anticipated to mildly swell up from about 4 per cent to nearly 6 per cent.
(5) From 2000 to 2050, the two descending groups in Italy's community will be the children and the working age, with proportions from about 14 per cent to over 11 per cent and from roughly 60 per cent to almost 50 per cent respectively. (6)Standing at number two in popularity during the period, the elderly made up the remaining quarter of the chart in 2000 and is envisaged to 42.3 per cent in the future.
(7) To summarise, both Yemen’s population and Italy’s are likely to see an increment in the old and a decline in the young. (8)However, Italy’s society is predicted to continue being older than Yemen's.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 404, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...visaged to 42.3 per cent in the future. 7 To summarise, both Yemen’s population ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, may, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1004.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.44247787611 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52851232527 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58407079646 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.7938280534 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.5 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.25 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27962143986 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163804482132 0.103423049105 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.173740211676 0.0843802449381 206% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255879209145 0.15604864568 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.204489267577 0.0819641961636 249% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.77 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.