The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the number of social networking sites visited by internet users in Canada in 2014 and in 2015. We can see from the data that, in general, there was an increasing of using more than one social networking sites.
According to the table, the number of users used three sites was only 14 percent in 2014 and 16 percent in 2015. There was a significant declined from 12 percent to 5 percent in 2014 and 16 percent to 8 percent in 2015 in the group of Canadian using four social networking sites. The group of people using five networking sites was the lowest group by having only 2 percent in 2014 and 4 percent in 2015.
As is shown from the graph, half of user did not use any networking site in 2014 and 2015 but the ratio of people using one social networking site was jumped from 22 percent to 36 percent in 2014 and from 21 percent to 28 percent in 2015. However, the amount of users who were using two social networking sites witnessed a dramatically decreased by 13 percent in 2014 and a slightly dropped by 4 percent in 2015.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | Shivam7090 | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-24 | Sagar Gurung | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-20 | phanduydat | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | cindycornelia98 | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | cindycornelia98 | 67 | view |
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. 67
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The illustrations show how chocolate is produced.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The illustrations show how chocolate is produced.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 861.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.37055837563 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.395885313 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.446700507614 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.8347560578 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1428571429 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22892430436 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154698683597 0.103423049105 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628780510446 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193633267394 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317722907672 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.36 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.