The chart below gives information about science qualifications held by people in two countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The chart below gives information about science qualifications held by people in two countries.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given bar chart demonstrates the percentage of people who hold science qualification in Malaysia and Singapore. The units are measured in percentages.

According to the Bar graph, the Master's degree holders are less than 5% both in Malaysia and in Singapore. The people holding Bachelor's degree in Malaysia are 10% whereas, in Singapore there are 20%. As welll as, Malaysia had a smaller increase than Singapore with nearly 5% in school leaving exams. There are more number of people in both countries without no science qualification.

Overall, a prominent feature is that a significantly low percentage of people hold science qualifications, that is Master’s and Bachelor’s degrees in science from university level studies in both countries. Finally, more than half the people in both countries hold no science qualification at all.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-06-20 vidya bhavanam 61 view
2018-07-01 honza 56 view
2018-06-26 ajmeet 67 view
Essays by user vidya bhavanam :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 163, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing Bachelors degree in Malaysia are 10% whereas, in Singapore there are 20%. As ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, well, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 727.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 132.0 196.424390244 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50757575758 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.38956122427 3.73543355544 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24046776147 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 75.0 106.607317073 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568181818182 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 221.4 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.1699056603 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.875 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11845951957 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549648706809 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500168278567 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0952128881037 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366244104635 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.