The given bar graph reveals the information about science qualifications by the individuals in two different countries such as: Malaysia and Singapore. The data is calibrated in the form of bar graph. It is a clear and coherent representation.
it is evident, that massive number of people were not involved in science field from Malaysia as well as Singapore, but at school learning exams individuals show great interest in this field as compare to bachelor and master degree.
At the first glance, it is clearly mentioned in the bar graph that, maximum number of people are not getting education in the field of science from both countries. Moving ahead, thirty percent people from Singapore and more than thirty percent from Malaysia were getting education in science at school learning exams. Moving further, 10% people in becholar and less than ten percent in master degree from Malaysia show interest in this field.
Apart from that, in Singapore about 20% at graduation level and less than twenty percent in master degree level individuals show keen interest to take science subject.
In summary, therefore, it is noticed that only few individuals were participated in science, but at master level ratio of people involved in this field is almost same in Malaysia and Singapore respectively. On other hand, for graduation and school learning exams more individuals get education in same field in two different countries.
- The world natural resources are being consumed at an ever- increasing rate? What are the dangers of this situation? What should we do? 73
- Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below 11
- Some people support development of agriculture like, factory farming and scientific creation of fruits and vegetables. While other oppose. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
- School teachers are more responsible for social and intellectual development of students than parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- In many countries, schools have severe problems with student behaviour. What do you think are the causes of this?What solutions can you suggest? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...a clear and coherent representation. it is evident, that massive number of peop...
^^
Line 3, column 100, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...ved in science field from both Malaysia as well as Singapore, but at school learning exams...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 345, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arning exams. Moving further, 10% people in becholar and less than ten percent in...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, thus, well, apart from, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1194.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19130434783 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71993272462 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465217391304 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 361.8 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3862571909 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.4 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9 5.23603664747 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108712879466 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0502393992914 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517502279521 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0772446526319 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363994058239 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.