The chart below gives information about science qualifications held by people in two countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart compares the science qualifications of citizens in two countries which are Malaysia and Singapore.
Overall, it is clear that the number of people who earn degrees in Singapore is much higher than that in Malaysia. It is also noted that the proportion of people leaving school exams or having no qualification in science in Malaysia is slightly higher than in Singapore.
According to the chart, the percentage of people holding a bachelor degree is way higher than those who own a master degree in both countries. There are just about 4% each of Malaysian and Singaporean earn a master degree, while 20% of people in Malaysia and 10% of people in Singapore have a bachelor degree. The proportion of people who earn a bachelor degree in Singapore (20%) is two times higher than its counterpart (10%).
On the other hand, the proportion of people leaving school exams in Malaysia is around 35%, while this number in Singapore is 5% less. There is a similar pattern in terms of the percentages of Malaysian and Singaporean people who do not qualify as science with 5% more people in Malaysia (65%) than in Singapore (60%).
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not by local people. Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places? 84
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops. Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view? 89
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development? 84
- In some countries, shopping online is replacing shopping at store. Discuss both the pros and cons of this trend. 84
- Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 941.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82564102564 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72796413048 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.476923076923 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.9687296284 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 117.625 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130574497023 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720893986699 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0347379693464 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0976590794674 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305179894419 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.