The chart below gives information about science qualifications held by people in two countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given bar chart compares data from a research taken into science qualification of Malaysians and Singaporeans.
According to the chart, the number of people in both countries who have master degrees is significant low comparing to the non-degree group.
The number of people who do not have any science qualification in Malaysia and Singapore accounted for an enormous percentage, which is approximate 65% and precisely 60%, respectively. In contrast, there is only a tiny proportion of candidates who already have had a master degree, about 3% in both countries.
On the other hand, just nearly one third of the candidates from Malaysia finished school leaving exams whereas the percentage for Singaporean candidates is about 35%. Additionally, exactly one fifth of asked Malaysians tell that they possess a master’s degree, which is double the number their rival have.
- The range of technology available to people is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor Others think it has an opposite e ect Discuss both views and give your opinions 89
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. They are Art Gallery, Pavilion, Pier and FestivalSummarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparis 84
- The chart below gives information about Someland's main exports in 2005, 2015, and future projections for 2025.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The chart below gives information about science qualifications held by people in two countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The chart below gives information about the most common sports played in New Zealand in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, third, whereas, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 793.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 138.0 196.424390244 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.74637681159 4.92477711251 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.42743929552 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09698479974 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.659420289855 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 230.4 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.7796598424 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 132.166666667 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0990855187865 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0509541591028 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0317934006376 0.0843802449381 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0644435679937 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325876757082 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.2329268293 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 61.2550243902 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.37 11.4140731707 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.