The chart below gives information about science qualifications held by people in two countries.
The comparison between the science qualifications of the population in Malaysia and Singapore is demonstrated by the given bar chart, shown in percentages.
Generally speaking, the proportion of university-graduated people is the observed larger in Singapore compared to Malaysia, which is not as much as the former. In addition, the figure for holders of non-science qualified takes up the largest in both nations.
As per data, while Singapore has fewer them unqualified for science, the neighbor accounts for those at the most, a gap of approximately one 5%. Furthermore, these South-East-Asia countries even reveal the same difference in the rate of students struggling with leaving exams, and that of Malaysia leads at 35%.
Turning to higher education ones, getting an undergraduate science degree is more popular among the population in Singapore, at one in ten, doubling more than that in its counterpart at only a fifth. This contrasts markedly with the greatest, in which the most minority in respectively two regions are those who have finished their postgraduate studies, recorded at less than one in twenty.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-04 | Ahmed Z | view | |
| 2021-09-14 | naufalrahman96 | 92 | view |
| 2021-02-23 | rajpatel90 | view | |
| 2020-07-03 | MAHIR VHORA | view | |
| 2020-07-03 | MAHAMMAD FAIZ FIROZBHAI VHORA | view |
- Global warming is one of the most serious issues facing the world to day 1 What are some causes of global warming 2 What can governments and individuals do to solve the problem 73
- The chart below gives information about science qualifications held by people in two countries 92
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2019 and 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 100
- The graph below shows the percentage of part time workers in each country of the United Kingdom in 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below shows information about fuel used in the transport sector in different countries in Europe compared to the EU average in 2009 and 2010 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 956.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43181818182 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3099017176 2.65546596893 125% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670454545455 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.6394436993 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.571428571 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1428571429 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105574999404 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0472016910628 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422760411542 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0686417735336 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463063405222 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 61.2550243902 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.06136585366 122% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.