The chart below gives information Information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity for the year 1990 and 2010.
The bar graph shows data on the proportion of Britishers donating money for charity by age groups for the years 1990 and 2010.
Overall, the money donated is increasing steadily from lower age groups to upper age groups. Despite this, the total amount of money give to charity was at peak from the middle age group and lowest in the adults age group.
There has been as slight increase manifested in the given age groups just above 15% in 18-25 age groups up to 40% in 36-50 age groups which fell to around 5% in the group 51-65 years. In the third group of 36-50 there was a massive resurgence to a highest point at above 40% in 1990.
In the year 2016 the charity percentage has started from 18-25 and is accounted as a just more than 5%. There has been a drastic increase has shown in the age group 26-35 in the charity as comprised to 30%. In the remaining groups the static increase has been shown.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-08 | kashyap sahil | 56 | view |
| 2022-12-08 | kashyap sahil | 61 | view |
- People should look after their health for personal benefits rather than a duty for a society What extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The best way to improve health is to do regular exercise To what extended do you agree or disagree 56
- The aging population is good for business the economy and society Others disagree Discuss both be used and give your opinion 78
- Discuss the reasons why more young people study abroad than in their home country 56
- Environmental issues have always been an international problem because governments are not imposing harsh punishments against offenders To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...36-50 there was a massive resurgence to a highest point at above 40% in 1990. ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 744.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.40236686391 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.12820421422 2.65546596893 80% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520710059172 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 211.5 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6969490459 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.125 5.23603664747 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135332070837 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0761668516586 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0886007286635 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117200514607 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100833685429 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.24 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.11 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...36-50 there was a massive resurgence to a highest point at above 40% in 1990. ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 744.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.40236686391 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.12820421422 2.65546596893 80% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520710059172 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 211.5 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6969490459 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.125 5.23603664747 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135332070837 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0761668516586 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0886007286635 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117200514607 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100833685429 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.24 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.11 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.