The rate of British citizens who contributed their money to charity divided by age groups between 1990 and 2010 is depicted in the given bar chart.
Overall, it is clear that the proportion of those who donated in this area declined between the years, which is particularly notable among those who are not in the older age groups.
As per the graph, those who were under 50 spent less in charity works in 2010, compared to 1990. The rate of decline in their expending habit was between 6 and 10%, and this is seen the highest among the youngest age group (18-25). When this group disbursed just over 17% in 1990, it declined by about 10% in 20 years of time. The percentage of decline ranged from 6 to 7% in the other two age groups (26-35 and 35-50). It should also be noted that the share of people who contributed to charity is seen ascending among these three age groups.
However, the case was different in case of those who were over 50. Out of about 30-40% ,there was around 3 to 4% hike in the percentage of those who spent money in this sector between the years, and this was seen higher in the age group: 50-65.
- Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing for example through cellphone tracking are security cameras In many cases the people being monitored are unaware that this is happening 89
- Now a days many people choose to be self employed rather than work for a company Why might this be the case What could be the disadvantage of being self employed 95
- Some people believe that the charity organizations should give aid to those in greatest need wherever they live Some people believe that the charity organizations would better concentrate on helping people who live in own country instead Discuss both view
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 55
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o are not in the older age groups. As per the graph, those who were under 5...
^^^
Line 9, column 87, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...se who were over 50. Out of about 30-40% ,there was around 3 to 4% hike in the per...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 18.0 5.60731707317 321% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 926.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.43062200957 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.15716789337 2.65546596893 81% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7784313669 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.888888889 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2222222222 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88888888889 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126480299204 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626928781729 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496632913901 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0900363254556 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.064307974125 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.71 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.82 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.