The provided bar chart compares the proportion of the British people donating to charity in 1990 and in 2010. The surveyed people are grouped according to their age.
Overall, a significant decrease in the proportion of the youngest Brits donating to charity was noted, while the middle-age groups suffered a moderate decline. However, the Older Brits (51 to over 65) were more likely to do donate in 2010 than 20 years earlier.
A closer look at the data reveals that in 1990, British citizens between 36 and 50 years old were the group with the highest proportion of charitable donations (over 40%). However, the youngest Brits (18-25) were the least likely to give money to charity, with just little over 15% of the people from this group reporting donations in 1990. All the other age groups were in the 30%-35% percent range.
In 2010, more mature-aged citizens were the biggest benefactors, with 40% rate in the age group 51-65. Elderly people (over 65) were at 35%, which is the same value as for the middle aged people (36-50), who used to be the most generous group some twenty years ago. The biggest drop was marked within the youngest Brits, were only 5% reported giving to charity, which is the lowest value in 2010.
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008 78
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? What sort of punishment should parents an 84
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at le 73
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views a 78
- The chart below gives information about southland's main exports in 2000, 20*..,and future projections for 2025.(20*..:for test purposes, use and refer to the current year) 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1017.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77464788732 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30935335506 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572769953052 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5097519123 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.7 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190998754933 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0881859032488 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457073703907 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134352650831 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491278048574 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.