The diagram shows the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The provided diagram depicts the alterations made on the grounds of West Park High School over the sixty-year period.

Overall, it is noticeable that the main road and the main school building remained in place for over half a century. The playground was reduced slightly, while the rest of the area went through considerable changes between 1950 and 2010.

In 1950, when the school was built, the building was facing the main road, and the spacious playground area was located behind the main school building. Family homes and the farmland were right next to the school.

Thirty years later, the whole lot of land was used by the school. Private housing was partially replaced by the car park, while the remaining land was used to erect the new science block, adjacent to the main school building. The farmland gave place to the new sports field.

In 2010, the car park grew in size to just under one half of the total school grounds, taking over the entire area formerly used as the sports field. Consequently, the playground was reduced in size and combined with the much smaller recreational area. The classroom area, however, remained intact.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 25, Rule ID: WHOLE_LOT[1]
Message: Use simply 'lot'.
Suggestion: lot
...the school. Thirty years later, the whole lot of land was used by the school. Private...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 967.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95897435897 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35832767056 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558974358974 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.4407535223 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.9090909091 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7272727273 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.54545454545 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146477473833 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581735957457 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406807934412 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0936214526551 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354696845635 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.