The bar chart describes the proportion of the UK people in spending money on charity, divided into five age groups, in two different years, 1990 and 2010. In overview, in 1990, residents of the first three age groups (18-25, 26-35, and 36-50 years old) were recorded to be more charitable than two other age groups (51-65 and over 65 years old), while in 2020, the surveyed data was otherwise.
In more details, in 1990, people aged from 18 to 25 years old were ten percent higher than those in 2020 in providing money to charity, accounted by around 17% in 1990 and 7% in 2020. Further, there was an upward trend in elderly donators by about 43% of citizens aged 36-50 years old, being the highest percentages among all age groups. Meanwhile, a downward trend was shown in the quantity of people in UK aged over 50 years old in contributing their money for charity purposes, surveyed by 35% people aged 51-65 years old and about 32% people aged over 65 years old.
In another surveyed year, in 2020, the progression of charity donators gradually increased from above 5% people aged from 18-25 years old until almost 40% people in the age group of 51-65 years old, being the highest amount among all five age groups. However, its percentage dramatically decreased by 35% of the UK people in giving money to charity.
- The Growing number of overweight people is putting a strain on the health care system in a effort to deal withthe health issues involved. Some people think that the best way to deal with this problem is to introduce more physical education lessons in the 56
- some people think that newspaper are the best media to learn and get information from while others believe that the internet is a better source discuss both views and give your own opinion 68
- The graph below gives information about cinema attendance in Australia between 1990 and the present with projections to 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where r 49
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at le 61
- Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality high school students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism on their teachers Others however think it will lead to loss of respect and discipline in the classroom Discuss both views 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 493, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... money for charity purposes, surveyed by 35% people aged 51-65 years old and abou...
^^
Line 5, column 351, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e UK people in giving money to charity.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1090.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69827586207 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34614250657 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51724137931 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.2437153937 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.714285714 112.824112599 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.1428571429 22.9334400587 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202503785497 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119419046182 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.032879524434 0.0843802449381 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162190925669 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240406730426 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.36 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.0658536585 154% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.