The pie charts give information about license programs in various domains including computer science, business, medicine and law at the National University in the years 1990,2000 and 2010. Overall, it is clearly seen that, computer science showed upward trend whereas business field illustrated downward trend from 1990 to 2010.
Firstly, in 1990, computer science and business areas were the highest segments of the pie chart by 30%. In this year, Medicine accounted for 25% degree and law made up the lowest percentage of domain with 15%. The rates changed in 2000. Computer science's popularity to increased with 40%. The second largest per cent of study area was medicine with 30%. Moreover business and law areas dropped to 30% and 10%, respectively.
In 2010, it is noticeable that computer science field was choosed by 45% students of university. Business declined from 20% to only 15% of the total degrees. On the other hand, law come back up to 15% of the total degrees granted and medicine declined to 25%.
- Life now is better than it was 100 years ago To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 52
- The maps show the village park 10 years ago and the village park now 79
- In your opinion, should young people choose their professions, or should their parents choose for them? 73
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 84
- The graph below gives information about international tourist arrivals in different parts of the world. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 357, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...nt of study area was medicine with 30%. Moreover business and law areas dropped to 30% a...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, moreover, second, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 850.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05952380952 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51635804748 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.8545493115 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.2727272727 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2727272727 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45454545455 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243650303519 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0781174660791 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0841308981894 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166976358101 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107443241668 0.0819641961636 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.