The Chart below show the distribution of families with children by employment status.
The given bar-chart detail the surveyed report stating proportional change in the employment of different child based families in Canada with regard to their family earning status over a period of 38 years from 1976 to 2014.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that during the earlier times, the majority of income was earned mainly by fathers, followed next by both the parents. However, after more than three decades, the reverse trend was seen in the working status.
According to the given illustration, in 1976, over half of the families were dependent upon the salary of their male counterparts. However, over time this proportion witnessed a dramatic decline of nearly 34%. On the contrary, in nearly one-third of the families, both the partners were responsible for family earning, while this applied to nearly 55% of the dual-earner couples in 2014, a significant rise of 20%.
ON the other hand, a slight uptick in the percentage of male lone parents and female lone parents were observed. The former rose to 4% from 1% in 1976 as opposed to the latter, which climbed at a double rate at 16%. Also, the figure of single earning mothers went up by 3%, whereas with a marginal dropdown, only 3% of families were left unemployed(5% down to 3%).
- The charts show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and B in two years 1960 and 2010 73
- The chart below shows the process of waste paper recycling 84
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010 84
- The maps below show the town of Langley in 1910 and 1950 77
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 227, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... decline of nearly 34%. On the contrary, in nearly one-third of the families, bot...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, third, whereas, while, on the contrary, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1073.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96759259259 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62691810514 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 106.607317073 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643518518519 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9991181578 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.222222222 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3333333333 5.23603664747 216% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146008188412 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0505585082895 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709011631212 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0896748323693 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0829972655566 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 40.7170731707 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.