The line graph below shows changes in the amount of coffee exported from three countries between 2002 and 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
The provided line graph compares the information on how much coffee in kilograms (millions) is exported from three countries( Brazil, Colombia, and Costa Rica) over a decade from 2002 to 2012.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that despite a few fluctuations, the coffee export witnessed a significant rise in each country by the end of the period. However, Brazil continued to be at the top position from 2004 onwards.
Costa Rica and Colombia experienced a contrasting trend until 2008, after which both followed a similar pattern. The former started at 15kg(millions), up by nearly 10kg(millions) compared to the latter. Later on, the former plunged to the lowest value of just 7kg(millions) in 2006 before a gradual rise to 20kg(millions) in 2012. On contrary, from the least value of just 5kg(millions), the latter rose up steadily by 7kg(millions) in 2006 followed by the lowest hit of the only 2kg(millions) in 2008. However, after that, a dramatic spike pushed the value up by seven times in 2012.
Brazil started at a 50% less value than Costa Rica, however, the export observed a continuous upward trend while facing a few ups and downs until 2010, after that the value trebled by the end of the period.
- The diagram below shows the water supply in Australia at present and in the future 78
- Some people think governments should care more about the elderly while others think they should focus on investing in education for younger people Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- 87
- The bar graph shows the percentage of elderly citizens in three countries in 1980 2000 and 2030 78
- The diagram below shows how the water cycle works 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1028.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96618357488 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75125756509 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570048309179 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6164124093 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.222222222 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144838574778 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602976025537 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0884698872113 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113130562835 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110392852117 0.0819641961636 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.