The bar graph provides the information about the amount of money spent on consumer goods by two different countries (France and UK) in the year 2010. Units are measured in pounds sterling.
Overall, it can be seen that the majority of expense was on cars by both the countries. In addition, both the countries spent less amount of money on perfume.
Moving on to the more detail, almost 3,75,000 pounds sterling were spent by France on computers, whereas 3,50,000 pounds sterling by UK. However, cars and books was the most preferred goods by the UK citizens and the expenditure on those goods was around 4,50,000 quid and 4,00,000 quid respectively.
The further chart demonstrates that the cameras was less popular than the perfumes. Moreover, expenses of the French people was more on the computers and cars (nearly 3,75,000 and 4,00,000 pounds sterling respectively). Furthermore, 3,00,000 quid was spent on books by France, while 4,00,000 quid by British people.
- While some people prefer to live in apartments others do not think an apartment is a suitable form of accommodation Do you think the advantages of living in an apartment outweigh the disadvantages 63
- Nowadays parents put too much pressure on their children to succeed what is the reason for doing this Is this a negative or positive development 67
- Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds Do you agree or disagree about this opinion 56
- Supermarkets should only sell food produced from within their own country rather than imports from overseas What are your opinions on this 61
- The table below presents the food consumption per person weekly in a European country in 1992 2002 2012 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 231, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...unds sterling respectively. Furthermore, 3,00,000 quid was spent on books by Fran...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 815.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1582278481 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65760239779 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544303797468 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 216.9 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.6851807528 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5555555556 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5555555556 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126234062361 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0540954369246 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0813622952287 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0897109107059 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0827047609537 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.