The chart below show the GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010.
The bar chart given below information about GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010. The data present in percentage. Overall, it can be seen that the higher percentage was Japan while the smallest was Ecuador.
In the one hand, in 2007 in Tunisia got around 6% which the biggest category, but every year degree percentage always experience education from 6% up to 3% vice versa for in Japan, experience increase significant namely from percentage degree which was the smallest 2% until which was the biggest around 6% which country category the higher.
On the other hand, for in Ecuador degree percentage always fluctuated from 2007 up to 2010 with degree percentage which the smallest in 2009 which got around 1%.
From three countries can be accepted conclusion, from 2007 to 2010 degree percentage three are experience increase as well as experience decrease. For Japan degree percentage always grow but for Tunisia, degree percentage always come down every year and in Ecuador the percentage fluctuated.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-19 | Jesslynindah | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | Arman Mansyur | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-22 | jenmin | 61 | view |
- Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines. Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages? 73
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement? 56
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement? 56
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 67
- The graph below gives information about internet users in three countries between 1999 and 2009. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, well, while, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 872.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19047619048 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59534731094 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 89.4386119421 43.030603864 208% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 124.571428571 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 5.23603664747 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260877455703 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162208902374 0.103423049105 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.233725988272 0.0843802449381 277% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192721518432 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.146456977695 0.0819641961636 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.