The chart below show information about European people of different age groups who went to gym once a month or more between 1990 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graphs illustrate about European people of different age groups who went to gym once a month or more from 1990 to 2010.
Overall, it is clear that people went to the gym in the first year was lowest but in the last year was highest. However, we can see if we look at the specific figures.
Look at the line graph in the first year 1990. It can be seen that the overall of number went to gym of 45 and over was lowest among four age groups and have number is 2%. Meanwhile, this number have significantly increased in 1998 was 5%. By contrast, four age groups have same figures in the first year. However, in 1998, 18-23 age group was highest 30%. Ranked after in terms of the highest percentage after 18-24 was 25-34 have number 20%.
Look at the line graph in the last year 2010. The people went to gym from 2002 to 2010 was highest. Almost all age groups have experienced strong growth since 2002. With 45 and over increased about 2% to 9%, 35-40 age groups have rose figure was 19%. However, the two age groups have the strongest growth was 18-24 and 25-34, have number 60% and 50%. So, it can be seen that the people in Europe always went to gym when they are younger people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-27 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
- The chart below shows the depth of snow cm in a particular ski resort in Canada in three individual years 67
- The table shows the information of total health expenditure per capita in five countries in 2019 73
- The table shows the information of total health expenditure per capita in five countries in 2019 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013 67
- The table below shows the percentage of households with computers and Internet access in three different countries from 2005 to 2015 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 966.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.27433628319 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 1.99792358341 2.65546596893 75% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486725663717 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.1058829203 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 64.4 112.824112599 57% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 15.0666666667 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191116385358 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0812704495331 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101890516395 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179389714539 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.150981028995 0.0819641961636 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.2 13.2329268293 47% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 90.09 61.2550243902 147% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.4 10.3012195122 43% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 6.89 11.4140731707 60% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 5.99 8.06136585366 74% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.