The chart below shows the aid from six developed countries to developing countries from 2008 to 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the aid from six developed countries to developing countries from 2008 to 2010
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words

The bar chart presents the financial support (billion dollars) of six developed countries, namely US, Germany, UK, Japan, Netherland and Sweden, to the developing ones. The figures were examined in three distinct years, commencing from 2008 to 2010.

Overall, it is evident that the US support ranked highest among categories throughout the timeline. Netherland and Sweden, however, both showed modest support in finance to developing countries.

Regarding the US, the supporting figures indicated fluctuating trend which hit its lowest point of approximately 18 billion dollars, in 2009. Nevertheless, a noticeable increase could be seen afterward, accounting for 25 billion dollars in 2010. Meanwhile, Germany, the UK and Japan showed moderate financial assistances which were in the range of 10 billion to 15 billion dollars.

Turning our attention to Netherland and Sweden whose supporting figures consistently showed least financial support during the examined years. Both countries provided about 5 billion dollars in 2008, both nearly reached the point of 10 billion dollars in 2009 and ended at the point of 7 billion dollars

Votes
Average: 8.9 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-10-09 thanhboyzz 89 view
2021-05-21 Piyush seth 78 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic
Essays by user thanhboyzz :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 86, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'showed the least'.
Suggestion: showed the least
...n whose supporting figures consistently showed least financial support during the examined y...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, nevertheless, regarding, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 971.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64534883721 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84716965908 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616279069767 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.2389052505 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.888888889 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123458167062 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0548026699885 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046876626933 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0860387368355 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606467908734 0.0819641961636 74% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 11.4140731707 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 86, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'showed the least'.
Suggestion: showed the least
...n whose supporting figures consistently showed least financial support during the examined y...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, nevertheless, regarding, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 971.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64534883721 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84716965908 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616279069767 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.2389052505 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.888888889 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123458167062 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0548026699885 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046876626933 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0860387368355 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606467908734 0.0819641961636 74% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 11.4140731707 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.