The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.
The given bar chart gives information about how much free time enjoyed by males and females of various employment status for the period of 1998 and 1999.
Overall, it can be seen that males were enjoying more free time in a week throughout the period.
Females who worked part-time spent almost 40 hours of leisure time in a week. Similarly, housewives celebrated for around 45 hours free time in year 1998 and 1999.
Full-time men workers enjoyed 42 hours of free time, but, the only 39 hours free time spent by females employees, which was least in those years 1998 and 1999. There were two groups who enjoyed most leisure time in a one week. Both unemployed and retired people accounted same amount of leisure time, which they enjoyed. Approximately, 80 hours leisure time enjoyed by unemployed and retired males. In contrast, women enjoyed nearly 70 hours during a week, in 1998 and 1999.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | RAYHAN MAHMUD | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-29 | Alex Christian | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | aimsonlyband6 | 73 | view |
- The position of women in society has changed markedly in the last twenty years Many of the problems young people now experience such as juvenile delinquency arise from the fact that many married women now work and are not at home to care for their childre 76
- The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 61
- Cambridge 2 test 1 11
- The bar chart shows the hours per week that teenagers spend doing certain activities in Chester from 2002 to 2007. 73
- The chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where r 93
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, similarly, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 754.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8961038961 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37477751042 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584415584416 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 211.5 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.2815545696 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.7777777778 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1111111111 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210550584522 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102716275103 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0385032085102 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134750311842 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536149746634 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.