The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast food in Britain.
The given bar chart gives the information about the expenditure on fast foods by the income groups per week in Britain whereas, graph shows consumption of fast food for the year 1970-1990.
Overall, hamburgers 40 pence was the highest expenditure on fast food by high income group. On the other hand, pizza was the least expenditure by low-income group.
According to the bar graph, high income class people spent more money on hamburgers than fish and chips, and pizza. Average income class people spent more on hamburgers but their spending on fish and chips, and pizza was more than other two income groups. Low income class people spent less on pizza and hamburgers and more on fish and chips
On the other hand, consumption of fish and chips was high than the other two in 1970, while hamburgers and pizza was less than 100 grammes. Initially hamburgers raised to more than 500 grammes in the year 1990, whereas pizza also raised near to 300 grammes. Over the time, fish and chips get less popular and decline to 200 grammes in the year 1990.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-20 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-09-27 | Sheikh Sajib | 67 | view |
| 2024-09-27 | Sheikh Sajib | 78 | view |
| 2024-09-27 | Sheikh Sajib | 61 | view |
| 2024-09-24 | Sheikh Sajib | view |
- The charts below give information about travel to and from the UK, and about the most popular countries for UK residents to visit. 67
- Anti social behaviour and level of depression are increasing in modern society among children These situation led many people believe that childhood is in crisis Do what extent do you agree or disagree 44
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast food in Britain 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 883.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82513661202 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27080577551 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.448087431694 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4498513377 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.375 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146696459809 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0743826947871 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112623109298 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120069004815 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.139135224227 0.0819641961636 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.71 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.