The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britian. The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods.
The chart compares three income groups in terms of the averagely spent amount of money on three kinds of fast foods weekly in Britain. The graph also illustrates the changes in the consumed fast foods during 20 years annually, from 1920 to 1990.
Overall, as can be seen from the bar chart, people categorized into high-income group generally spent more money to eat fast foods, compared to the other groups. It is also clear that while hamburgers were the most popular fast food among British people with high-income, low-income people tended to consume fish and chips more. Regarding the line graph, the main trend is the steadily increased amount of hamburgers and pizza over the period shown.
Regarding the chart, while the high-income group spent over 40 pence averagely on hamburgers per week, followed by the average-income group who spent 33 pence, only 15 pence spent on purchasing hamburgers by the low-income group. However, rich and poor people spent the same amount of money on fish and chips, at 17 pence each, which was the most favorite fast food among the poor people, whereas people were in the middle class bought more fish and chips, at 24 pence. In addition, there was a significant difference among groups as to the expenditure spent on pizza. The wealthy people spent the highest amount of money on pizza, at 18 pence, followed by the average-group people with 10 pence, and the lowest income people spent the least amount of money on pizza, at just 7 pence.
Turning to the line graph, it appears that in 1970, fish and chips were the most popular consumed fast food among British people, standing at 300 grammes. However, over the following 15 years, there was a steady decrease in the consumption of fish and chips, reaching 200 grammes, before gradually rising to 240 grammes at the end of the period. By contrast, the amount of used pizza that initially stood at 20 grammes, the lowest rate, increased gradually over the next decade, at 80 grammes, and then experienced a significant growth, reaching its peak at 280 grammes in 1990, after surpassing the consumed fish and chips in 1988. Finally, the consumption of hamburgers increased gradually to 100 in 1975, and then it continued its upward trend over the rest of the period shown, reaching a peak of over 500 grammes in 1990.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | ahmadrava88 | 67 | view |
- Some countries today have passed laws against smoking tobacco in public buildings such as offices and restaurants. Other countries have no intention of doing this.Consider the possible arguments on both sides of this debate, and reach your own conclusion 84
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 67
- The graph below shows the trends in consumption of fast foods. 73
- Families who send their children to private schools should not be required to pay taxes that support the state education system. 73
- The chart shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 828, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing a peak of over 500 grammes in 1990.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, regarding, so, then, whereas, while, as to, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 33.7804878049 213% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1940.0 965.302439024 201% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 395.0 196.424390244 201% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91139240506 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 3.73543355544 119% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4896079476 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 106.607317073 168% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.453164556962 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 552.6 283.868780488 195% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 13.0 3.36585365854 386% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.3704259573 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.230769231 112.824112599 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.3846153846 22.9334400587 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38461538462 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236063352134 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0991145204861 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636284591921 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176449233587 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0756323570765 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.79 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.0658536585 154% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.