The bar chart illustrates the number of films rented and sold according to three film formats.
Overall, while DVDs sale showed an upward trend over the period, the rentals showed a downward trend. Blu-ray films appeared whereas VHS disappeared.
Rentals started at nearly 200.000 units which was the highest one among four categories and double the figure for DVDs and quadruple that of rentals. Afterward, rentals decreased steadily and ended up at approximately 50.000 times in 2011. In 2002, the number of DVDs was 50.000 disks, it then rose speedly before reaching a peak in 2007. This format declined gently in the next year and finally ended around 200.000 discs. As a result, this categorized became the highest ranks between the two formats of sales. Noticeably, in 2004, the number of DVD sales outnumbered that of rentals. Otherwhile, the number of VHS sales was smaller than rentals at nearly two times that of rentals (100.000 tapes) in 2002 and thus, it fell gradually until 2006. This format totally disappeared from the store. After 2006 - 4 years timescale until the disappearance of VHS sales. Blu-ray was first introduced in the store in 2007 with the modest number of copes of 10000. This number was surging in the last duration, at around 20000 units
- The bar graph shows the number of people employed in different workplaces in one region of Australia in 2001 and 2008 Summarize the data by selecting and reporting key factors and making comparisons where appropriate 38
- The chart below shows the annual number of rentals and sales(in various formats) of films from a particular store between 2002 to 2011.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The chart below shows the annual number of rentals and sales( in various formats) of film from a particular store between 2002 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The pictures below show the recycling process of wasted glass bottles Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- As well as making money businesses also have social responsibilities Do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 795, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...mat totally disappeared from the store. After 2006 - 4 years timescale until the disa...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, so, then, thus, whereas, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1063.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0141509434 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46432814834 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608490566038 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.8746643376 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.9285714286 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1428571429 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.21428571429 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195165437902 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674962438558 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411871760725 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128885437112 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0143125392639 0.0819641961636 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.