The maps below show the village of stockeford in 1930 and 2010.
The maps illustrate the changes that have taken place in the village of stokeford between 1930 and 2010.
Overall, the housing areas had expanded and restructured along with a road to admit more residents, while the lands for agricultural purposes vanished.
In 1930, stokeford consists of two farmlands in the southwest and the northeast; a post office, a primary school and shops in adjacent to the farmfields, as well as gardens together with a large house in the southeast. These facilities were connected to the main road which separates stokeford into two sides.
By 2010, regarding the accommodation systems, plantation, gardens and stores had been demolished to make way for new blocks of flats on the eastern and southern banks of the stream. In terms of the transport network, more streets were built, branching off the major road to provide access to additional housing. Those were also lengthened along the leading road and parallel to the Stock River. Relating to service section, the huge house within the grounds had been broadened to become a retirement home. In close proximity to the nursing home, the grade school’s size had increased twice as much as the previous one. Moreover, the mail depot directly opposite the elementary school had remained intact .
- The chart below shows the annual number of rentals and sales( in various formats) of film from a particular store between 2002 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The pictures below show the recycling process of wasted glass bottles Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below shows the annual number of rentals and sales(in various formats) of films from a particular store between 2002 to 2011.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The bar graph shows the number of people employed in different workplaces in one region of Australia in 2001 and 2008 Summarize the data by selecting and reporting key factors and making comparisons where appropriate 92
- The following bar chart shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960 1980 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 500, Rule ID: CLOSE_SCRUTINY[1]
Message: Use simply 'proximity'.
Suggestion: proximity
...roadened to become a retirement home In close proximity to the nursing home the grade schools s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, moreover, regarding, so, then, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 3.0 24.0651302605 12% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1051.0 1615.20841683 65% => OK
No of words: 208.0 315.596192385 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05288461538 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 4.20363070211 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59344142493 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 176.041082164 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.620192307692 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 320.4 506.74238477 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 208.0 20.2975951904 1025% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1051.0 106.682146367 985% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 208.0 20.7667163134 1002% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 60.0 7.06120827912 850% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0913421355905 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0913421355905 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.088240015524 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123216997921 0.056905535591 217% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 106.4 13.0946893788 813% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -131.18 50.2224549098 -261% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 83.2 11.3001002004 736% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.49 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 18.36 8.58950901804 214% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 56.0 9.78957915832 572% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 85.2 10.1190380762 842% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 56.0 10.7795591182 520% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.