The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given picture illustrates the outline of a small town, whose name is Islip, and the plans for improving it in the future.
Overall, a dual-carriageway is going to be built, followed by plenty of additions and modifications of facilities.
As can be observed, there is now a main road leading straightforwardly to 2 rows of shops in the north. Heading east from the west, a school is located to the eastern south of that road and a park is on the other side. In addition, situating between those 2 buildings are 2 residential areas, which are in the center of the countryside.
Regarding the planned project, a dual-carriageway will be constructed covering the 2 rows of stores, the main road, the housing zones, and the park. Furthermore, the main road will be turned into a pedestrian zone with the shops to the north of it being replaced by a bus station, a shopping center, a new car park, and a new area for accommodating. While the shops in the south and the school remain unchanged, the car park will be decreased in size to make room for a larger housing area.
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both thes 78
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The graph below shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The maps below show the Happy Valley Shopping Center in 1982 and 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, regarding, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 4.0 24.0651302605 17% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 883.0 1615.20841683 55% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 192.0 315.596192385 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59895833333 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 4.20363070211 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05941153082 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 176.041082164 61% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557291666667 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 506.74238477 52% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 2.52805611222 396% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.9479597727 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 110.375 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103885846786 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0484686572361 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534803269307 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0690095527667 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640843477934 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 50.2224549098 128% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 12.4159519038 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 78.4519038076 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.