The chart below shows the annual number of rentals and sales( in various formats) of film from a particular store between 2002 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart illustrates the quantity of rentals and sales of films per year according to various formats from a typical store over the period from 2002 to 2011. The general overview here is that the number of rentals and DVD sales always surpass the rest by more than two times.
To specify, the number of films rentals went down slightly from 185,000 in 2002 to 152,000 in 2005, before a more significant decrease to 58,000 in 2011. In comparison, DVD sales followed a different pattern. The number of DVD sales climb sharply in the first 6 years from 48,000 in 2002 to the highest point of 212,000 in 2007, followed by a slight drop to 180,000 in 2011.
On the other hand, the figure of VHS sales declined considerably from 85,000 in 2002 to 10,000 in 2005, before this format had no longer been sold in the store. On the contrary, Blu-ray appears firstly in 2007 and the number of its sales increased gradually from 2,000 in 2007 to 14,000 in 2011.
In conclusion, the total sales of the store have followed a downward trend in recent years.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, so, in conclusion, on the contrary, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 867.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5873015873 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31985090875 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539682539683 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3463518968 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.375 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.625 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.125 5.23603664747 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249132173061 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123616922817 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714694704749 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159753405083 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0788442439502 0.0819641961636 96% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.97 61.2550243902 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.5 10.3012195122 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.