The bar chart illustrates the production of rice yearly in 4 different nations in 1995,2005 and 2015.
Overall, What stands out from the graph is that nation A was the highest figure in the manufacture of rice in 2015 while the lowest million tones witnessed by country D in both 1995 and 2005.
Looking at the graph for more details, country A reached a peak at 50 million tonnes in 2015 while more than 40 rice products were produced by nation B at the same time. In addition, the first place in country B was in 2005, however, it just equals the first runner-up in country A with nearly 50 million tonnes. Moreover, in 1995, the production of rice in both nations A and B even created a few and stands in last place with about 45 and 35, respectively.
On the other hand, countries C and D produced rice smaller than the 2 countries above and the highest figure in those countries was about 5 times as low as countries A and B. In nation D, the manufacture of rice in 1995 was the same as that in 2005, with nearly 5 million tonnes.
- The chart shows the proportion of working age adults in four countries from 1960 to 2050 Units are given in percentages Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 89
- The graph below gives information about changes in the birth and death rates in New Zealand between 1901 and 2101 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The maps show how the industrial area will change into a housing area in the future 11
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 73
- The charts show information about children learning musical instruments in 1996 and 2016 in the UK 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The bar chart illustrates the production...
^^
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...acture of rice in 2015 while the lowest million tones witnessed by country D in both 19...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, moreover, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 852.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.36923076923 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48559822851 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487179487179 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 31.9412726415 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.714285714 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8571428571 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4285714286 5.23603664747 199% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354265245186 0.215688989381 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190785673709 0.103423049105 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0923738891176 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267284341119 0.15604864568 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0801073309475 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 77.91 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.36 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.