The chart below shows the average cost of monthly contract for four different mobile (cell) phones in a European country from January to September 2002, measured in euro.
The chart demonstrates the average price of month to month contract for four distinctive portable (cell) telephones in a European nation in eight first months of 2002 which was measured in Europe.
Generally, the figures mostly varied with an upward trend from the beginning to the end of the period.
It can be clearly seen from the line chart that the cost of monthly contract for Domo almost hold the highest position in four kinds of the phone with the gradual increasing pace from 15 dollars at the beginning of the period to its peak at 25 dollars in six months later, then it decreased slightly but still kept higher than the other ones. From January to June, the price of monthly contract for Domo and Sim TX experienced a significant rise interleaving with some negligible fluctuations form 15 dollars to 20 dollars and from 8 dollars to 14 dollars respectively while the figure for Lex in this period nearly remained stable at 11 dollars and that of Alpha also stayed steady at 5 dollars but falling slowly from the middle of April to June.
The fickleness of four kinds of the phone all focused in the last months of the period, which was apparently shown by the remarkable growth of cost of the monthly contract for Alpha from 5 dollars to its peak at 25 dollars. In addition, the figure for Lex also gradually peaked at 18 dollars. Meanwhiles, the number of Slim TX declined by 6 dollars at four last months of this period and that of Domo slightly went down from the peak in July to 23 dollars in September after improving from 20 dollars in June to the peak in July.
- The chart below shows the average cost of monthly contract for four different mobile (cell) phones in a European country from January to September 2002, measured in euro. 67
- The illustration shows a bicycle, which is an environmentally friendly vehicle. Describe this vehicle and its environmentally friendly feature. 56
- Drug abuse is becoming more and more common in manycountries. What are some of the problems associated withdrug abuse, and what are some of the possible solutions? 56
- Today people are living longer, so they should work longer. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Accidents are common on roads. What are the causes of this problem? Can you speculate the effects of this phenomenon? How could the frequency of accidents be reduced? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, if, so, still, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 33.7804878049 184% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1302.0 965.302439024 135% => OK
No of words: 285.0 196.424390244 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56842105263 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47296493213 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 106.607317073 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494736842105 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 379.8 283.868780488 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 40.0 22.4926829268 178% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 111.451096624 43.030603864 259% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 186.0 112.824112599 165% => OK
Words per sentence: 40.7142857143 22.9334400587 178% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85714285714 5.23603664747 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262262545065 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140053750095 0.103423049105 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0997171134095 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176014618553 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108265233332 0.0819641961636 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.4 13.2329268293 154% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.26 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.11 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.0 10.9970731707 164% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.