The chart below shows the average hours spent per day in leisure and sports activities,
by youngest and oldest populations, in the US, in 2015.
The given bar chart illustrates the average amount of time per day that people aged 15-19 and
75+ in the US spent on different activities in 2015.
Overall, it is clear that on average, watching TV consumed the most amount of leisure time for
both age groups. In addition, except for socialising and communicating, there was a stark
difference between the amount of time these two groups spent on each activity.
In 2015, people aged 75+ in the US spent an average of 4.5 hours per day watching TV, while
those aged 15-19 spent an average of 2.4 hours. People aged 75+ also spent more time
reading, at 1 hour per day, compared to the younger group, at 0.2 hours. The older group also
spent far more time relaxing and thinking than the younger group, at 0.6 and 0.1 hours
respectively.
On the other hand, the younger group spent over twice as much time on the computer than
the older group, at an average of 1.1 and 0.5 hours respectively. Sport, exercise, and recreation
was also favoured more by the younger group, with 15-19 year-olds spending an average of
0.6 hours while the older group spent around 0.2 hours. A similar amount of time was spent
socialising and communicating, with both groups spending just under an hour a day on this
activity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-10 | Nguyễn Ngọc Phương Vy | 73 | view |
| 2022-06-10 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 87 | view |
| 2021-10-26 | tamle | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-06 | dinhthu05 | 84 | view |
| 2021-02-11 | denistran85 | 78 | view |
- he chart below shows the number of visitors to the main attractions in a Europe country between 1981 and 2001 67
- The chart below shows the average hours spent per day in leisure and sports activities by youngest and oldest populations in the US in 2015 70
- The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019 84
- The pie charts below show the different types of courses which were followed by the students during the years of 1984 1994 and 2004 79
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, except for, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1061.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77927927928 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46412865698 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472972972973 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.5882622679 43.030603864 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 117.888888889 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 14.0 3.83414634146 365% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246313897532 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125514881247 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0899792578457 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10767230046 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0855387565531 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.75 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.