The chart below shows the number of visitors to the main attractions in a Europe country between 1981 and 2001
The bar graph provided illustrated the figure for travelers who went to some main destinations in a European nation from 1981 to 2001. In general, the number of tourists to the central amusement park dominated the chart in the three years surveyed, while the reserve pattern was witnessed in that in a central zoo.
To commence, the central zoo experienced a relatively stable number of people in 1981,1991 and 2001 respectively, and stand at roughly 2 billion viewers. Besides, the number of tourists to the Science park was subject to overall volatility. In 1981, the number of tourists was approximate 2.5 billion, followed by a slight increment to about 3 billion in 1991 before hitting the bottom of the chart in 2001.
The figure for visitors going to central amusement park in 1991 was 7 billion then underwent a minimally decrease to 6 billion in 1991 and bounced back to 6.5 billion in 2001,There was a surge in that going to national park in Europe, which climbed from 3 billion in 1981 to 4.5 billion in 2001. Time witnessed a drastic variation in the number of visitors who went to the national gallery. It was around 2.5 billion people in 1981 and kept fourth place in the chart, before shooting up to nearly 6 billion in the last year surveyed and ranked second in that time
- The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019 84
- The pie charts below show the different types of courses which were followed by the students during the years of 1984 1994 and 2004 79
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development 73
- The chart below shows the average hours spent per day in leisure and sports activities by youngest and oldest populations in the US in 2015 70
- he chart below shows the number of visitors to the main attractions in a Europe country between 1981 and 2001 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('minimally') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decrease') instead of another adjective.
...rk in 1991 was 7 billion then underwent a minimally decrease to 6 billion in 1991 and bounced back t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 241, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... going to national park in Europe, which climbed from 3 billion in 1981 to 4.5 bi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, second, so, then, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1065.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71238938053 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63564204225 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491150442478 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.8214600285 43.030603864 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.125 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.25 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186367860211 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0952489075504 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0323397182431 0.0843802449381 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143165010087 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.021199412261 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.