The chart below shows the average hours spent per day in leisure and sports activities, by youngest and oldest populations, in the US, in 2015.
The bar chart gives information about how many hours that the populations aged 15 to 19 and 75 and over spent on six different types of activities in the United States in the year 2015.
Overall, watching TV was considered the most popular compared to the others. It is also clear that the older generations preferred watching TV, reading and relaxing and thinking, while the figures for young people in the remaining activities were higher.
Those aged 75 and over spent nearly 4.5 hours watching television a day, which was by far higher than that of young populations (around 2.4 hours). Very similar patterns can be seen for reading and relaxing activities. Specifically, teenagers only read and participated in relaxing and thinking activities for approximately 0.2 hours per day. However, the figures for the elderly were 1 hour for the former and 0.5 hours for the latter.
In comparison, both the young and the old spent less than one hour a day socializing and communicating. In terms of using computers, the younger group spent over twice as much time as the older one, at 1.1 and 0.5 hours respectively. Sport, exercising and recreation were also preferred by the 15 to 19 age group, with an average of 0.5 hours as opposed to only 0.2 hours by the elderly.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-09-10 | Nguyễn Ngọc Phương Vy | 73 | view |
2022-06-10 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 87 | view |
2021-10-26 | tamle | 78 | view |
2021-07-06 | dinhthu05 | 84 | view |
2021-02-11 | denistran85 | 78 | view |
- The picture below shows how a hot balloon works 73
- Today TV channels provide men s sport shows more than women s sport shows Why Should TV channels give equal time for women s sport and men s sport 73
- The movement of people from agricultural areas to cities to work can cause serious problems in both places What are the serious problems What measures can be used to solve these problems 84
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Every year an increasing number of people suffer from fast food related diseases The government therefore should impose a high tax on fast food To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1056.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84403669725 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74707456244 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582568807339 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0005263121 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.6 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23409719208 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.089547711885 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633650738301 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135195431095 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657129353992 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.