The line graph demonstrates how many crime occured in three types burglary, car theft and robbery in city centre of Manchester in 9 years period.
In general, burglary made up the highest number of crime in Manchester city at the beginning of the given period. On the other hand, the lowest number of crime was robbery according to the graph.
Initially, the number of burglary began at just under 3500 in 2003 and it reached a peak of around 3750 in 2004. However, the figure registered a steeply decline, from nearly 3750 to just over 1000, between 2004 and 2008 and it increased slightly to 1500 in 2009, next four years, it maintained the same level just under 1500.
Moving to the rest, car theft was saw fluctuations from 2003 to 2009 (1500), while robbery experienced a minimally reduction 500. Ultimately,car theft had a gradually rise of 2500. Robbery was the least type of crime in Manchester city centre and it was not noticeable change.
- The graph below gives information about the number of cases of diarrhea in Mashhad between 1983 and 1992 11
- To a certain extent I agree that we do not need to watch live entertainment performances since we can watch online However I also think that watching live gives us other pleasures There are several reasons why I believe that browsing online is useful Firs 56
- The chart below shows changes in three different areas of crime in manchester city centre from 2003 to 2012 61
- The graph below gives information about the number of cases of diarrhea in Mashhad between 1983 and 1992 11
- More people are shopping online today than ever before Why do people choose to shop this way Are there any disadvantages to shopping online 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 33, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun crime seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much crime', 'a good deal of crime'.
Suggestion: much crime; a good deal of crime
The line graph demonstrates how many crime occured in three types burglary, car th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 144, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('steeply') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decline') instead of another adjective.
...in 2004. However, the figure registered a steeply decline, from nearly 3750 to just over 1000, be...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 69, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t was saw fluctuations from 2003 to 2009 1500, while robbery experienced a minima...
^^
Line 4, column 103, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('minimally') instead an adjective, or a noun ('reduction') instead of another adjective.
...o 2009 1500, while robbery experienced a minimally reduction 500. Ultimately,car theft had a gradual...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 139, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , car
...ed a minimally reduction 500. Ultimately,car theft had a gradually rise of 2500. Ro...
^^^^
Line 4, column 154, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('gradually') instead an adjective, or a noun ('rise') instead of another adjective.
...reduction 500. Ultimately,car theft had a gradually rise of 2500. Robbery was the least type of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 170, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ltimately,car theft had a gradually rise of 2500. Robbery was the least type of c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, while, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 785.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75757575758 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56925382114 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587878787879 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1352135256 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.125 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189899976414 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0839100011145 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0666621797242 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121086817448 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542796948916 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.