The chart below shows the changes in three different areas of crime in Manchester city center from 2003-2012
The graph represents the variation in levels in the three main areas of crime in the centre of Newport city in the time period from 2003 to 2012.
To start with, it was 3400 incidences of burglary in 2003 and 3750 in 2004. Fortunately, in the next 4 years it fell down dramatically and reached the absolute minimum in 2008 (1100 incidences), however, it then grew by 300 accidents and remained fairly constant by 2012.
Car theft was a steady level of crime from 2003 to 2004 and got reduced in next 5 years from 2700 up to 2250. The number then increased to 2700 in 2012.
Robbery reached its peak in 2005, which was 900 cases and decreased back to 500 in 2008. In the following two years, the number of incidences rose to 700 and continued to stay at this level in 2012.
In conclusion, in the Newport city centre, the rate of burglary fell significantly, the level of robbery remained fairly constant, whereas car theft raised and had the biggest number of incidences in 2012.
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 56
- The chart below shows the changes in three different areas of crime in Manchester city center from 2003 2012 73
- The chart below shows changes in three different of crime in Manchester city center from 2003 2012
- The chartbelow shows the changes in three different areas of crime in Manchester city center from 2003 2012 73
- The chart below shows the changes in three different areas of crime in Manchester city center from 2003 2012
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 122, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... years from 2700 up to 2250. The number then increased to 2700 in 2012. Robbery rea...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then, whereas, in conclusion, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 810.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.55056179775 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49309107195 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533707865169 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0913128487 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.25 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1933875668 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867221376381 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0920883039435 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120498343891 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103144909468 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.98 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.