The chart below shows changes in three different areas of crime in manchester city centre from 2003 to 2012

The provided line graph illustrates how three distinct categories of delinquency in manchester city center changed over a 9-year period, starting in 2003.

Overall,it can be seen from the graph that the number of burqlary experienced a downward trend in contrast to car theft. In addition, the figure for robbery shown no significant change over the examined period.

Looking at the graph for details, the number of burqlary rose from 3400 in 2003 to reach its peaks of around 3750 in 2004,and then underwent a dramatic fall to its lowest point of 1100 in the next four years. Subsequently, the figure for burqlary witnessed a gradual increase to just under 1500 in 2009, prior to a slight decline to 1400 in 2012.

Meanwhile, about 2300 car theft affaires took place in 2003, following with a minimal decrease to just under 2000 in 2006. Afterwards, a considerable growth to roughly 2800 was observed in the quantity of car theft at the end of the period. While the figure for robbery was relatively the same at approximately 600 recorded in both the first year and last year.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...ear period, starting in 2003. Overall,it can be seen from the graph that the num...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, then, while, in addition, in contrast, in contrast to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 904.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88648648649 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67357274718 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632432432432 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0376206014 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 5.23603664747 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117609512823 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.048491109649 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055986829375 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0811879584199 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0644617627254 0.0819641961636 79% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.