The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport city centre from 2003–2012 . Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features , and make comparisons where relevant .
Several key trends are depicted by the graph showing data concerning 3 categories of wrongdoing occurred in 3 different domains in the main center of Newport between 2003 and 2012 in terms of the proportion of the occurrences annually.
Overall, during the whole time scale, the proportion of housebreaking collapsed drastically, leveling-out nearly 1400 incidents by 2012, with stealing cars and larceny fluctuating around 2900 and 650, respectively.
Beginning with the burglary, this misdeed accounted by far the highest division in terms of the ratio of incidents, peaking at approximately 3400 in 2003, with experiencing a minor upward blip; reached its highest ratio in 2004; nevertheless, a 3% overwhelming deteriorate was happened from 2004 to 2008, which was put the housebreaking ratio between another 2 categories.
Turning to the rubbery, this group was the lowest in 2003, and despite its fluctuations; plateaued for the next 9 years; the same trend is also evident for carjacking. Another result worth pointing out is that in spite of a moderate shrink came about in 2006; it tumbled by up to 1% in the following years illustrating in the graph.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-10 | Abhishek Neupane | 56 | view |
| 2020-10-27 | Negin hadisadegh | 78 | view |
| 2020-05-21 | gisellanathania | view | |
| 2018-03-13 | To Vien | 82 | view |
- Some people think that it is good for a country s culture to import foreign movies and TV programs Others think that it is better to produce these locally Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport city centre from 2003 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, nevertheless, so, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 977.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25268817204 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12633830749 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.677419354839 0.547539520022 124% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 22.4926829268 164% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.8540704247 43.030603864 176% => OK
Chars per sentence: 195.4 112.824112599 173% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.2 22.9334400587 162% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 5.23603664747 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0817483912987 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0421429933092 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504640083787 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0513134188802 0.15604864568 33% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521409313569 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.9 13.2329268293 165% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.38 61.2550243902 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.5 10.3012195122 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.23 8.06136585366 127% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.4329268293 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.9970731707 153% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.0658536585 154% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.