The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport City Centre groom 2003-2012.
The line graph depicts how the rate of burglary, car theft and robbery changed between 2003 and 2012 in Newport City Centre.
Overall, the rates of burglary reduced from the beginning of the period till the end of the period. However, the number of car thefts did not drop as much as burglary. As for the frequency of robbery happening during this period, it remained greatly consistent and it was also the lowest number of crime as compared to the other two.
The occurrence of burglary decreased the most over the twelve years. In 2003, there were around 3400 cases of burglary. This figure rose slightly by about 200 in the following year, and then it experienced a dramatic drop until 2008 at a rate of 1100 incidents. From 2009 to 2011, the number of burglary went up slightly but it still remained low at 1400 cases in the end of the period.
The amount of car theft and robbery differs greatly. However, it is interesting to note that they followed a similar trend because both crimes did not reduce much by the end of the period. There were 3400 cases of burglary in 2003 and this is the same twelve years later. Similarly, theft from people was approximately 600 in 2003 and this figure remained almost the same in 2012.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-05-16 | bettychua@gmail.com | 56 | view |
| 2018-05-16 | bettychua@gmail.com | 56 | view |
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport City Centre groom 2003-2012. 56
- It is not necessary to have access to the Internet to live a full life What is your opinion 87
- Some of the methods used in advertising are unethical and unacceptable in today’s society.To what extent do you agree with this view? 73
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport City Centre groom 2003-2012. 56
- Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing (for example, through cellphone tracking and security cameras). In many cases, the people being monitored are unaware that this is happening.Do you think the advant 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, similarly, so, still, then, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1018.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60633484163 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33083946165 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533936651584 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.021116492 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.8333333333 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4166666667 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101394039965 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0396048028625 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510260593949 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0799986147697 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0694589663965 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.