The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport City Centre groom 2003-2012.
The line graph depicts how the rate of burglary, car theft and robbery changed between 2003 and 2012 in Newport City Centre.
Overall, the rates of burglary reduced from the beginning till the end of the period. However, the number of car thefts did not drop as much as burglary. The frequency of robbery happening during this period remained greatly consistent and it was also the lowest number of crime as compared to the other two.
The occurrence of burglary decreased the most over the twelve years. In 2003, there were around 3400 cases of burglary. This figure rose slightly by about 200 in the following year, and then it experienced a dramatic drop to 1100 incidents in 2008. From 2009 to 2011, the number of burglary went up slightly but it still remained low at 1400 cases in the end of the period.
The amount of car theft and robbery differs greatly. However, it is interesting to note that they followed a similar trend because both crimes did not reduce much in 2012. There were 3400 cases of burglary in 2003 and this is the same twelve years later. Similarly, there was approximately 600 cases of robbery in 2003 and this figure remained almost the same in 2012.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-05-16 | bettychua@gmail.com | 56 | view |
| 2018-05-16 | bettychua@gmail.com | 56 | view |
- Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing (for example, through cellphone tracking and security cameras). In many cases, the people being monitored are unaware that this is happening.Do you think the advant 89
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport City Centre groom 2003-2012. 56
- The graph below shows the average daily spend of three categories of international visitor to New Zealand from 1997 to 2017 74
- It is not necessary to have access to the Internet to live a full life What is your opinion 87
- Some of the methods used in advertising are unethical and unacceptable in today’s society.To what extent do you agree with this view? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, similarly, so, still, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 980.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68899521531 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3320438691 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.5434538562 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.6666666667 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4166666667 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.16666666667 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115527921005 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0431513483044 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519007798527 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.085240081931 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0704357712869 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.28 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.