The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005.
The bar charts compare to the percentage of different sources that provided energy in france in 1995 and 2005.
It is clear that coal was the most common type of energy production for French. In addition, petro consumption was the highest decrease.
In 1995, the rate of energy production by coal was highest, at 29.80%, while the figure for gas was slight slowly, at 29.63%. There are 6.40% and 4.90% the energy consumption by nuclear and other sources respectively. At the same time, 29.27% was the percentage of energy production by petro.
In 2005, the proportion of energy production by coal was increased slowly, at 30.93%, but still remained highest, while the figure for petro was significant went down by around 10% to 19.55%. The percentage of gas provide for the citizen of france was slow increase to 30.31%. Meanwhile, nuclear and other kinds of energy production were insignificant rise to 10.10% and 9.10% respectively.
- Nowadays more and more people decide to have children later in their life What are the reasons What are the effects on society and family life 78
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010. 61
- The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005. 61
- The given graph shows the consumption of fast food in the UK (per week) from 1970 to 1990. 73
- The given graph shows the consumption of fast food in the UK (per week) from 1970 to 1990. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 831.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36129032258 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72618626863 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522580645161 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 223.2 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2770740122 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.3333333333 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2222222222 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237148952353 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112098601026 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100481167324 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182053716054 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11567750773 0.0819641961636 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.92 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.