The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005.
The pie charts compare the percentage of some kinds of energy production in France in two years 1995 and 2005.
It is clear that Coal was the highest kind of energy that the French consumed. In addition, the figure for Petro was a significant decrease.
In 1995, the proportion of energy produced from Coal was highest, at 29.80%, while the figure for Gas and Petro were slightly slower, at 29.63% and 29.27% respectively. Nuclear stood at 6.40% of the total energy produced in France. At the same time, only 4.90% of the total energy was produced from other sources.
In 2005, the rate of energy produced from Coal was 30.93%, still remained the highest of total production, while the figure for Gas was still insignificant slower at 30.31%. The percentage of Petro was a significant fall on around 10% to 19.55%. By contrast, the figure for Nuclear and Other sources were slightly increased to 10.10% and 9.10% respectively.
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in four countries in 1995 and 2002, and projections for 2050 67
- The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005. 56
- The percentage of school aged boys in two different age groups who participated in 5 different sports in the UK in 2010. 56
- The charts below show what UK graduate and post graduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008. 67
- The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 186, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd 29.27% respectively. Nuclear stood at 6.40% of the total energy produced in Fr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, still, while, in addition, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 784.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96202531646 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57833528667 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512658227848 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.444139193 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.1111111111 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5555555556 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159406660834 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840542087639 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123567776229 0.0843802449381 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152172932718 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.154110980962 0.0819641961636 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.08 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.