The bar chart compares the gender balance over various academic levels in senior institutions in Australia in the year 1999.
It is clear from the information that the most noteworthy disparity between males and females in Australian institution was found in the diploma of skilled vocation, in which a staggering 90% of the holders are male. In contrary to this, the numbers of Bachelor’s degree holders in each sex were practically identical, reaching approximately 50% for each.
Evidently, the gender balance in remaining qualifications in Australia witnessed some considerable distinctions. Female graduates who acquired undergraduate diploma were doubled that of their male counterparts. By contrast, numbering at 70%, postgraduate diploma was surpassed by male holders. Likewise, female and male accounted for 40% and 60% in master degree respectively.
Overall, male prevailed over female in holding diploma for undergraduate and bachelor’s degree only, whereas the antithetical phenomenon was pervasive in other qualifications in Australia in the year 1999.
- The table below gives information about rail transport in four countries in 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The graphs below show the types of music albums purchased by people in Britain according to sex and age.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 84
- The charts below give information about travel to and from the UK, and about the most popular countries for UK residents to visit.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Do you think that an ageing society will disappear? What are the advantages and disadvantages of having more old people in society? 11
- Nowadays it is more difficult for children to concentrate to pay attention in school.Discuss the causes and propose some solutions. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 929.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.91719745223 4.92477711251 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42435926247 2.65546596893 129% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.630573248408 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.9218138693 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.125 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.125 5.23603664747 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0806213575148 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0380932014147 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401666973856 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0610096624208 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381026563878 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 61.2550243902 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.3012195122 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.06 11.4140731707 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.51 8.06136585366 130% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.