Over the past decades, there is a contentious issue on whether we should encourage children to stay close with pets, albeit at the cost of children vulnerability. While there are some sophistication on this controversy, the reasons of congregating children and pets remains compelling. The aim of this essay is set to review both viewpoints and explain the reasons behind this incentive.
To begin with, there is ample evidence suggested that keeping pets with children is perceived as a typical lesson in cultivation, as well as life enrichment. In fact, apart from learning the pet language through daily interactions, children are likely to accustom to empathy and compassion by caring and feeding their beloved pets. Recent empirical psychological tests conducted by the Pet Society ascertain that adults who lived with their pets in childhood are more likely to participate in life-saving professions entailing medical sectors and rescue teams. Consistent with this line of thinking, this habit can help fostering mental growth by shaping one’s conscience.
Although the benefits of being a junior pet owner is remarkable, such impacts should not be overstated, especially the potential detrimental effects begot by the intrinsic behaviours of pets. What this means is the fact that pets like dogs have an innate disposition of playing and rolling in dirt containing countless infection factors, while the sharp claws cats endowed with could hurt their owners. Extensive studies from the Medical University established that 30% pet owners have been hurt or infected by pets in the last year. Seen in this light, it is essential to retain cautions on interacting with these animals. Yet, coupled with these challenges, children have a high tendency to acquire the skill of self-protection, and thus intensify their physical abilities.
In conclusion, both advantages and disadvantages coexist on becoming a junior pet owner; however, both sides constitute stimulus in one’s personal development. It is predicted that more children will become auspicious pet trainers in foreseeable future.
- Academic Task 3 Rainfall Line Chart Summarise the information by selecting and report in the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 36
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- People equate a good salary with success Some say that money is not what will make you successful In your own opinion what will make a person truly successful Give specific reasons and examples to support you answer 57
- The graphs show figures relating to hours worked and stress levels amongst professionals in eight groups.Describe the information shown to a university/college lecturer. 84
- Using a computer every day can have more negative than positive effects on young children.To what extent do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 621, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to foster' or 'foster'.
Suggestion: to foster; foster
...s line of thinking, this habit can help fostering mental growth by shaping one's con...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, thus, well, while, apart from, in conclusion, in fact, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1789.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52160493827 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00869257089 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632716049383 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3892054349 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.785714286 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1428571429 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92857142857 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167728851829 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0610942204771 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0348170084736 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104624993335 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0148768259655 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.